ESSENCE AND EXISTENCE/textAestheticsLogicSumma Theologica/textONTOLOGY AND METAPHYSICSWisdomPages with broken file linksLogicAestheticsPRINCIPAL LIVING ONTOLOGISTSMoore's paradoxMainOmbox/coreOmboxPhilosophersLudwig WittgensteinPhilosophersItalian PhilosophersGerman PhilosophersImmanuel KantAmerican PhilosophersRoman PhilosophersCommunityRecent blog posts
263 Posts
All Contributors
No replies yet.


Let us take up the problem of the truth value of such statements as 'Cerberus barks'. Falsity, as a sweeping answer covering all statements containing 'Cerberus', would be over-hasty: first, because the statement 'There is no such thing as Cerberus', at least, is true; and second, because whatever statements we adjudge false must admit of compounds, e.g., their negations, which will be true. Truth, as a sweeping answer, would encounter parallel difficulties(mol278)

0 0
  • Upvote
  • Reply
No replies yet. Be the first!
Write a reply...